Archive for February, 2010

Kernal-Nomics: Big Ethanol Inflated Job Claims

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

The Ethanol Industry is LYING/exaggerating the number of jobs the Ethanol Industry creates, WHY?

http://www.ewg.org/agmag/2009/11/kernalnomics-the-ethanol-lobbys-inflated-jobs-claims/

Sound Science Prevails in EPA Decision

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Sound Science Prevails In EPA Ethanol DecisionPosted by Don Carr in Biofuels, Featured Articles on December 1, 2009 | no responses | ShareThis

WASHINGTON December 1 –The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said today that it will wait until mid-2010 to decide whether to grant a waiver request that would allow up to 15 percent ethanol in gasoline. Growth Energy, an ethanol trade and lobby group, requested the waiver. EPA based its decision on the need to conduct more tests to determine the higher blend’s impact on engines. Under current federal rules gasoline can contain no more than 10 percent ethanol.

Environmental Working Group Midwest vice-president Craig Cox, who manages EWG’s agriculture programs from its Ames, Iowa, office, said this about EPA’s decision:

“EPA should be congratulated for resisting efforts by the well-funded and politically well-connected ethanol lobby to short-circuit a science-based analysis of corn ethanol’s adverse impacts on engines, public health and the environment. Blending more ethanol into the gasoline supply without conducting a sound scientific analysis of its total impact only serves a narrow constituency of large corn growers and ethanol producers while ignoring the potential risks a blend increase poses to consumers. It’s time we recognize that ethanol has been unable to attain independent viability as a motor fuel despite lavish subsides and mandates, and even more important, that it has been unable to prove that its production and use are beneficial to the environment.”

The corn-ethanol industry has lobbied fiercely for the increase in blend limit, claiming that a government-mandated increase in ethanol use would create more than 130,000 new jobs. But a new EWG report, citing independent university and government research, concludes that ethanol lobbyists have dramatically exaggerated the employment benefits of their proposal, even as automakers and small engine manufacturers warn that a higher ethanol blend could cause serious damage to millions of motors in vehicles, boats and lawn equipment.

View the report, Kernelnomics: The Ethanol Industry’s Inflated Jobs Claims

# # #

Another Ethanol Plant Fined For Polluting

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

Winnebago ethanol plant fined over
water pollution allegation

Southern Minnesota ethanol plant to
pay pollution fine

Last update: January 29, 2010 – 9:30 PM

One of Minnesota’s earliest corn ethanol
plants will pay an $891,000 penalty for
alleged water pollution, according to an
agreement announced Friday by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

Corn Plus in Winnebago dumped wastewater
from a cooling tower illegally into pipes that
discharged it into a county ditch and then
into Rice Lake, according to the complaint.
The alleged violations occurred between
2006 and 2008.

The problems came to light when citizens in
the southern Minnesota community
complained about the odorous and
discolored discharges and alerted state
inspectors.

Under terms of the settlement, Corn Plus
agreed to pay a $200,000 civil penalty and at
least $691,000 to correct the problems by
September.

It must install a closed-loop system to use
less water and discharge it only to a licensed
wastewater treatment plant.

Company officials could not be reached for
comment.

Last fall Corn Plus paid $150,000 to resolve a
criminal water quality charge by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.

The ethanol plant was constructed in 1993,
and produces about 50 million gallons of
ethanol annually.

TOM MEERSMAN