The Ethanol Industry is LYING/exaggerating the number of jobs the Ethanol Industry creates, WHY?
http://www.ewg.org/agmag/2009/11/kernalnomics-the-ethanol-lobbys-inflated-jobs-claims/
The Ethanol Industry is LYING/exaggerating the number of jobs the Ethanol Industry creates, WHY?
http://www.ewg.org/agmag/2009/11/kernalnomics-the-ethanol-lobbys-inflated-jobs-claims/
Sound Science Prevails In EPA Ethanol DecisionPosted by Don Carr in Biofuels, Featured Articles on December 1, 2009 | no responses | ![]()
WASHINGTON December 1 –The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said today that it will wait until mid-2010 to decide whether to grant a waiver request that would allow up to 15 percent ethanol in gasoline. Growth Energy, an ethanol trade and lobby group, requested the waiver. EPA based its decision on the need to conduct more tests to determine the higher blend’s impact on engines. Under current federal rules gasoline can contain no more than 10 percent ethanol.
Environmental Working Group Midwest vice-president Craig Cox, who manages EWG’s agriculture programs from its Ames, Iowa, office, said this about EPA’s decision:
“EPA should be congratulated for resisting efforts by the well-funded and politically well-connected ethanol lobby to short-circuit a science-based analysis of corn ethanol’s adverse impacts on engines, public health and the environment. Blending more ethanol into the gasoline supply without conducting a sound scientific analysis of its total impact only serves a narrow constituency of large corn growers and ethanol producers while ignoring the potential risks a blend increase poses to consumers. It’s time we recognize that ethanol has been unable to attain independent viability as a motor fuel despite lavish subsides and mandates, and even more important, that it has been unable to prove that its production and use are beneficial to the environment.”
The corn-ethanol industry has lobbied fiercely for the increase in blend limit, claiming that a government-mandated increase in ethanol use would create more than 130,000 new jobs. But a new EWG report, citing independent university and government research, concludes that ethanol lobbyists have dramatically exaggerated the employment benefits of their proposal, even as automakers and small engine manufacturers warn that a higher ethanol blend could cause serious damage to millions of motors in vehicles, boats and lawn equipment.
View the report, Kernelnomics: The Ethanol Industry’s Inflated Jobs Claims
# # #
Production of Biofuels is seriously depleting our potable water supply.
Please, write a letter to your legislator stating you don’t want to see a state or federal mandated increase of 15% ethanol in our gasoline! Read info about Petition in link below!
Friday, May 08, 2009
Findings show that turning biomass into electricity is more beneficial than turning it into transportation fuels.
By Tyler Hamilton
By MARK STEIL , 04.04.09, 02:35 PM EDT
Ethanol’s main by-product, which is sold as livestock feed, has raised
potential food
safety concerns.
Several studies have linked the byproduct, known as distillers grain, to
elevated rates of E. coli in cattle. And now, distillers grain is facing
further scrutiny because the
Food and Drug Administration has found that it often contains
antibiotics left over from making ethanol.
Ethanol production relies on enzymes, yeast and sugar to convert corn
into fuel. And just as the wrong bacteria in the body can sicken people,
it can also cause a variety of ailments in a batch of ethanol.
Mark von Keitz with the University of Minnesota’s Biotechnology Institute
said in ethanol production, the main enemy is a bacterial bug that makes
lactic acid.
“What these organisms do is they also compete with the yeast for the
sugar,” said von Keitz. “But instead of making alcohol, they
make primarily lactic acid.”
If enough of the bacteria are present, von Keitz said fermentation can be
ruined.
“It gets acidified to the point that the yeast is no longer able to
properly produce ethanol, and then you’re stuck with a big batch of corn
mash,” said von Keitz.
If that happens, there’s no ethanol and no profit. To prevent the
problem, producers rely on medicine.
“What people operating these plants are trying to do is to keep
these lactic acid bacteria in check,” said von Keitz. “And one
way of doing that is with the help of antibiotics.”
Ethanol producers use penicillin and a popular antibiotic called
virginiamycin to kill bacteria. And that raises two potential
concerns.
One is that these treatments might promote the growth of bacteria that
are resistant to antibiotics. The development of these
“superbugs” is a major concern in
health care because
they reduce the effectiveness of medicines.
Von Keitz found some bacteria that were, in fact, resistant when he
sampled bacteria at four Midwest ethanol plants several years
ago.
The second concern is that the antibiotics could find their way to humans
through the food chain.
The
U.S. Food and Drug Administration has taken a mostly hands-off
approach to the use of antibiotics in the ethanol industry. But amid
increasing concerns over food safety in recent years, the agency is
taking a closer look.
“A year ago we put a survey out to the FDA field people to collect
samples of those distillers grains, and start analyzing for antibiotic
residues,” said Linda Benjamin, a chemist with the FDA’s Center of
Veterinary Medicine.
Samples were requested from 60 ethanol plants, including some in
Minnesota. She said testing showed that many contained antibiotics,
mainly four types.
“Penicillin, virginiamycin, erythromycin and tylosin,” said
Benjamin.
At this point the story gets murky. Benjamin won’t say if any of the
antibiotics exceeded federal guidelines.
Those guidelines are part of the problem; they’re a patchwork and far
from definitive on what levels of antibiotics in distillers grain are
safe.
If the FDA decides to restrict antibiotics in the ethanol industry, it
could have far-reaching consequences.
Distillers grain is a major source of low-cost livestock feed. Any
restrictions on its sale and use as feed will hurt the profit-scarce
ethanol industry and the livestock farmers who rely on it.
Charlie Staff, executive director of the Distillers Grain Technology
Council, said distillers grain is one of the few dependable moneymakers
left for the ethanol industry.
“If they didn’t have distillers grain as a revenue, many more of
them wouldn’t be able to operate,” said Staff.
Meanwhile the regulatory process continues to play out. The FDA will test
more distillers grain samples, and expects to issue a final report this
summer.
The maker of virginiamycin declined to comment, but the company is
expected to ask the FDA to approve the antibiotic as a human food
additive.
Depending on how this regulatory battle winds up, it could change the way
Minnesota’s 18 ethanol plants distill their product.
Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material
may not be published broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed
Click on this link and read this story on WASTING our precious potable water supply!